Mission to Protect Intelligent Life | 保护智能生命特派团 | बुद्धिमान जीवन की रक्षा के लिए मिशन | Misión para proteger la vida inteligente | بعثة حماية الحياة الذكية | Mission pour la protection de la vie intelligente

The future of life is under threat...

Let's fix that.

Earth Observation Early Warning & Response

An open, contributor-friendly project to turn Earth observation into earlier warnings and better response decisions for catastrophic risk.

Status: Active
Started: December 2025
Contributors: 3
Project Manager:
Project Manager

Introduction & Rationale

Earth observation (EO) systems already monitor floods, fires, drought, storms, conflict-related destruction, and more. But in many high-stakes scenarios, the limiting factor is not "more imagery". It is the end-to-end chain from sensing to decision-ready signals: clear definitions of what to detect, how quickly, at what spatial scale, with what confidence, and how those signals translate into actions.

This project aims to produce an open, practical early-warning and response framework for catastrophic risk. The unique contribution is a decision-first EO architecture: start from the response decisions that matter, derive the minimum viable signals and latency requirements, then map to feasible sensing and processing pipelines.

What makes this project new

  • Decision-first requirements. We start from concrete response decisions and work backwards to sensing requirements (latency, coverage, resolution, confidence, false alarm tolerance).
  • Multi-hazard, multi-signal. We treat EO as a portfolio of signals (optical, SAR, thermal, RF, atmospheric) rather than a single sensor type.
  • Failure-mode aware. We explicitly design for degraded infrastructure: cloud cover, comms disruption, model drift, adversarial conditions, and data access constraints.
  • Contributor-friendly task packaging. Work is broken into discrete, mergeable tasks with dependencies and clear outputs.

Research Objectives

  • Define a short list of catastrophic-risk scenarios where EO can realistically change outcomes in days-to-weeks timescales.
  • Specify decision-ready signals and requirements (what to detect, by when, and with what confidence).
  • Map those requirements onto feasible architectures (sensors, orbits, ground segment, processing, dissemination).
  • Produce an open reference playbook: signals, pipelines, evaluation protocol, and a pathway to pilots.

Methodology (high level)

  1. Scenario selection: pick 3–5 scenarios with clear decision points and credible data sources.
  2. Signal specification: define the minimal signals and their requirements (coverage, revisit, latency, spatial scale, uncertainty).
  3. Pipeline design: propose an end-to-end pipeline from raw data to alert product.
  4. Evaluation: define metrics and backtesting approach against historical events and open datasets.
  5. Operationalisation: produce a pilot plan and partner map.
EO Early-Warning Scenarios: Use-Case Shortlist
Completed
Inputs:
  • MPIL mission and catastrophic risk framing
  • Existing EO capabilities and public datasets
  • Response decisions that plausibly change outcomes (days-to-weeks)
Process:
  • Select 3–5 scenarios and define the key decision points and stakeholders for each.
  • Write a 1-page brief per scenario: what to detect, why it matters, and the rough decision timeline.
  • Explicitly flag limits where EO can’t support a scenario without overclaiming.
Outputs:
Completed by:
Completed by Rory Dick
Decision-Ready Signal Requirements (Latency, Coverage, Confidence)
Completed
Inputs:
  • Selected scenarios from the use-case shortlist
  • Examples of EO alert products (public)
Process:
  • For each scenario, define minimal signals and requirements: revisit, latency, spatial scale, false alarm tolerance, uncertainty reporting.
  • Make requirements decision-first: tie each requirement to a real action that can be taken.
Outputs:
Completed by:
Completed by Ellroi
Dataset & Sensor Inventory (Open Sources First)
Outstanding
Inputs:
  • Selected scenarios from the use-case shortlist
  • Public EO data catalogues (Sentinel, Landsat, MODIS/VIIRS, etc.)
Process:
  • Build an inventory of candidate datasets/sensors per scenario, prioritising open access.
  • For each source, record modality, latency, coverage, resolution, and key limitations.
Outputs:
Coverage/Revisit Simulation + Chart
Outstanding
Inputs:
  • Decision-ready latency and revisit targets from requirements
  • First-order constellation assumptions
Process:
  • Run a lightweight revisit model to estimate feasibility bands for revisit/latency.
  • Produce a chart for fast communication and a CSV for reproducibility.
Latency Budget (End-to-End)
Outstanding
Inputs:
  • Scenario deadlines and operational needs
  • Typical EO product delays and processing stages
Process:
  • Decompose end-to-end latency into stages and identify dominant terms.
  • Define target latency bands and minimum metadata requirements (timestamps, caveats).
Reference Architecture Sketches (End-to-End Pipeline)
Outstanding
Inputs:
Process:
  • Sketch an end-to-end pipeline per scenario: ingest – preprocess – model/heuristics – alert product – dissemination.
  • Include failure modes and degraded-ops assumptions.
Outputs:
Evaluation Protocol (Backtesting + Metrics)
Outstanding
Inputs:
Process:
  • Define metrics: time-to-detect, false alarms, spatial accuracy, uncertainty calibration, operational latency.
  • Specify a reproducible backtesting approach using open data where possible.
Outputs:
Pilot Plan + Partner Map
Outstanding
Inputs:
Process:
  • Propose a realistic pilot: scope, timeline, data access, success criteria, and governance.
  • Map credible partners: existing EO programmes, NGOs, research groups, and operational agencies.
Outputs:

Project Repository

This repository contains materials generated from the project.

Contributor Dashboard: Log In

Please enter your credentials to continue.

Invalid username or password. Please try again.

Contributor Registration

Please submit your details for review.

Please provide a brief, informal bio. This may include your interests, any particular skills that you may have, your motivations for wishing to contribute to MPIL projects, or anything else that you feel is relevant.

An error occurred. Please try again.